AI documentation and practice software: how the draft reaches your system
The most common question before a pilot is: does this work with our practice software? With KiPT Voice, the answer is the same for every system, because the path needs no interface: you review the draft, copy it, and paste it into the free-text field where you already document. What differs is not the path, but what the manufacturer of your system itself offers.
Editorially checked against product behaviour and the stated primary sources; not individual medical or legal advice.
Why there is no interface here
A documentation draft is text. Every practice-management system has a field for text, and copying text into it works in all of them. That is why the list below is not a list of supported systems, but a list of systems there is something to say about.
Doing without an interface has a price, and it should be named: the text is not automatically assigned to the open record, and it does not fill structured input masks. In exchange, the workflow is independent of the system vendor's versions, service packs and approvals — and the click with which you paste it is exactly the moment a suggestion becomes documentation.
The systems, one by one
Twelve pages, one question each: what is the system for, which field does the draft go into, and what does the manufacturer itself publish about AI in this system? Several manufacturers publish nothing on this — and that is stated too, because it matters just as much for a decision as an announcement would.
- tomedo (zollsoft): software for Mac, iPhone and iPad; the manufacturer publishes its own function, tomedo.Intelligence.
- medatixx: Windows client-server family; the manufacturer distinguishes between an assistant for software questions and a documentation function.
- CGM ALBIS: deeply integrated AI documentation according to the manufacturer, plus the add-on product CGM one DokuAssistent.
- CGM MEDISTAR: many specialties, medical care centres and group practices; the manufacturer's statement on German and European data centres.
- CGM TURBOMED: solo and group practices; its own AI documentation assistant, with no statement on where it is processed.
- T2med: Windows, Ubuntu and macOS; no in-house documentation AI, but connections to third-party products.
- x.concept (medatixx): its own editions for outpatient departments and medical care centres; for this system the manufacturer names no documentation AI.
- Doctolib Praxissoftware: its own AI consultation assistant, with no statement on where it is processed on the product page.
- EPIKUR: Mac, Windows and Linux; AI modules that, according to the manufacturer, summarise existing session notes.
- PsyPrax: practice software for psychotherapists; no in-house AI function on the pages reviewed.
- DURIA: Windows systems from the cooperative; no in-house AI function on the pages reviewed.
- Any other practice software: the same path, with the three points you check at your own workstation.
What stays the same in every system
Regardless of manufacturer, the audio recording stays on the practice computer. For structuring, transcript text reaches the provider configured in settings, unless the practice sets up a local model. The draft is displayed, not filed: what enters the record is decided by you, at the moment you paste it.
What the tool does not do also stays the same. It does not evaluate the content of the conversation and makes no clinical judgement; it orders what was said. Responsibility for the documentation stays entirely with the treating person.
The three questions that make any comparison comparable
If your system's manufacturer has its own offering, do not compare product names, compare data paths. Three questions are enough, and they should be answered in writing.
- Where does the audio recording stay — on the practice computer or with a service?
- Where does the transcript text go, to which provider, and in which country is it processed?
- How long are recording, transcript and draft stored, and who has access during that time?
- Which contracts and technical measures cover any external processing?
- What happens if a patient declines or withdraws consent for the recording?
Frequently asked questions
Which practice-management systems does KiPT Voice work with?
Any that has a field text can be pasted into. The reviewed draft is copied into the practice software; there is no interface, and none is needed for this.
Is anything installed in the practice software?
No. The application runs alongside it on the practice computer. It does not reach into the practice-management system and reads nothing from it.
Where do the statements about the manufacturers come from?
Exclusively from their own public pages, read on 4 September 2026, with source and date in a table on each page. Statements not found are marked "not stated".